.:. gotblogua .:.

August 14, 2006
@ 15:16 / 3:16 pm
by :: gotjoshua

hoping for enlightenment

a retrospective self-critical piece

why oh why can’t i be free from this suffering? Most especially this blasted lack of enlightenment. I wish they had enlightenment for sale at walmart, maybe in the isle next to the 3 pack of disposable penises.

So if I understand my situation right, i am here in a state of wanting something. Yes, I want enlightenment. I want to be free from suffering. I want to clearly see the source of all suffering and the underlying truth of my decisions. I want to be free from indecision about doing. I want to be free from wanting. Did you catch that? I WANT to be free from WANTing… cute huh?

So I hope, and i pray, and i meditate and i wonder and i wander.
And i continuously trick myself into thinking that maybe i will someday believe the people who say “everyone is already enlightened, they just don’t realize it”… maybe someday i will feel that i understand this, that i am a part of it. Maybe someday i will be so bored of trying to attain a state of trylessness that i will puke out my last utterance of this silly hackneyed banal overused obnoxious word :ENLIGHTENMENT…

Please allow me to repeat my self… i want to be free from wanting… how fucking ridiculous is that??? i want it so bad that i try to create it by meditating and trying to accept it… just sit still and peacefully accept it……. nope, there are still thoughts there, i’m not enlightened yet….. oMMMMmmmm…. accept…. nope, judgement=not yet ….. accEPTTT… ummm no…. ACCEPT g.damnit….shit maybe tomorrow, lets get a falafel…

But really, what do i want? i want peaches and roses and loving all day… nothing but the very best, and complete superiority to the masses and freedom from any negative circumstance… so basically my ego, my little me, wants to be spiritually superior, to be closer to god than the others, to be a force of change in the world, to be an all powerful cocreator, to experience perpetual peace. And in order for my ego to experience all of these things it has to be transcended. Sounds like bullshit to me. Catch 22, impossible paradox… bullshit.

Maybe not. maybe so, maybe paradox is the only part of the illusion that is true.

anyway, here i am, still wanting… for that matter, wanting the wanting, no matter how aware i become of the wistful wasteful whithering nature of that wanting. and i watch. i observe. i observe the hope, independent of the object of hope… and i clearly see the hope is not needed… for it represents an illusion of lack… but hey why not hope? why not desire? this body wouldn’t be here if it weren’t for hope and desire…

so to deny the hoping, to deny the wanting, what is that? what will that denial bring?

to steer the hope… to steer the wanting… ahh, that sounds good, towards what shall i steer? towards the wanting itself? or perhaps towards the lack?

towards what shall i move? and where will i move from?

do i move from thought? or do i move from the stillness of truth?

and by the way how do i tell the difference?

4 Comments »

  1. YIKES!!!!!!
    Fine thinking…fine writing…(no judgement intended)…just an observation…
    You’re right too, i think, about all of it…especially maybe the falafel!
    love and more love and the such like…

    Comment by meem — September 8, 2006 @ 12:21 / 12:21 pm

  2. I think I need some help with this…How does one define “enlightenment”?
    To be enlightened is to be free of thought? I don’t think that is possible for a human with a healthy brain, except maybe very briefly…
    Can we interact with others when “enlightened”? Where does one go to learn more about this concept? Any suggestions?
    PoPz

    Comment by popz — September 10, 2006 @ 1:16 / 1:16 am

  3. OK I can help (i think)…
    #1 - being free FROM thought is different than being without thought.
    eg: not being in jail does not imply the jail is not there…
    eg2: watching the clouds go by from above in an airplane is quite different from getting rained on.

    #2 - if ONE were to play the silly game of “defining” enlightement, the response would be pure silence and stillness. When WE _TRY_ to define enlightenment, we are damned to inferiority, as the mind cannot actually describe a state where the essence of consciousness has transcended the mind… but we can try… in this state the thoughts are easily seen as clouds and the true essence of consciousness that dwells in the body (aka: the observer, theSelf) doesn’t care if they are rain clouds or fluffy white ones.

    #3 - interaction is most certainly possible in an enlightened state, even preferable and often embued with more luminosity and truth (aka. more enlightened ;-)

    Comment by gotjoshua — September 10, 2006 @ 11:33 / 11:33 am

  4. De rente tarieven voor de komende maand…

    Waarom kennen de drie grootste economieën ter wereld zulke opmerkelijke verschillen als het om de rente gaat?…

    Trackback by Rente tarieven — February 6, 2010 @ 5:39 / 5:39 am

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

this wordPress site is: Earth friendly web hosting powered by wind and solar energy